The Will of Anthony Woodville, Earl Rivers

On 23rd June 1483, Anthony Woodville, Earl Rivers, the brother to Queen Elizabeth, brother-in-law to King Edward IV and uncle to King Edward V sat down at Sheriff Hutton Castle in Yorkshire to perform the ultimate reminder of his own mortality. If he needed any such reminder.

Anthony had been taken prisoner when Richard, Duke of Gloucester had taken possession of the person of the young King Edward V at Stony Stratford. It is impossible at this distance and with the remaining evidence to establish whether Anthony was indeed plotting against the Protector as Richard alleged. His family in London opposed plans to grant Richard the full powers his brother seems to have intended, but Anthony’s own part in this is unclear. He had headed the Prince of Wales’ household in Ludlow and was escorting the twelve year old to London, but his part in any plot remains unproven.

Regardless of his guilt or innocence, Anthony could have been in little doubt as to his imminent fate. It provided an opportunity for some reflection. Reflection upon a life of extraordinary advancement. Anthony’s grandfather, Richard, had been chamberlain to John, Duke of Bedford, Regent of England and France and uncle to King Henry VI. Shortly after Bedford died in 1435, Anthony’s father, also named Richard, married the duke’s widow, Jacquetta of Luxembourg. The marriage caused a scandal and the pair were fined for failing to obtain permission when the union became public knowledge.

Richard Woodville had married far above his station and once the dust had settled, he was created Earl Rivers to bridge this social gulf, transforming his family’s fortunes. The couple went on to have fifteen children together and it was one of their daughters, the eldest, who was to further invigorate the prospects of the Woodville clan. Elizabeth, the widow of a Lancastrian knight, Sir John Grey of Groby, who had been killed at the 2nd Battle of St Albans in 1461, had two sons and no way to provide for them. In seeking to secure their future from the new King Edward IV, she caught his eye and became his wife, promoting the Woodvilles to the status of royal relations. Anthony, like his father, had fought for the Lancastrians at Towton, but the family now tied their banner to the House of York.

Anthony married Elizabeth Scales and in her right became known as Lord Scales. He accompanied Margaret, sister of King Edward IV, for her marriage to Charles the Bold, Duke of Burgundy in 1468. On the sixth day of the wedding feasts, Anthony was to take part in a tourney against the Bastard of Burgundy, Duke Charles’s older half-brother. The Bastard, also named Anthony, just to confuse matters further, was a famed soldier and jouster. Anthony Woodville had also won for himself an enviable reputation in the lists. As a mark of respect, the Bastard of Burgundy would not oppose Lord Scales, a man he considered a brother in arms. Adolf de Cleve fought in the Bastard’s place and in the half hour contest broke seventeen lances to Scales’ eleven. Anthony lost, but was far from disgraced.

On his return to England, he indented to King Edward to provide five knights, fifty five men-at-arms, two thousand nine hundred and forty five archers, twenty four ship-masters and one thousand and seventy six mariners for a period of three months. This substantial force was meant to aid the Duke of Brittany against the French but was never used in that cause. On 25th October 1468, Anthony went to sea with five thousand men to patrol the coast against an invasion by Queen Margaret of Anjou, Henry VI’s wife, rumoured to be preparing an attack from Harfleur.

On 12th August 1469, Richard Woodville, Earl Rivers and another of his sons Sir John were executed on the orders of the Earl of Warwick as rebellion against King Edward grew. Anthony succeeded to his father’s earldom and became entitled to the office of Constable of England, a prestigious position that he waived his right to in favour of the king’s brother, Richard, Duke of Gloucester. In spite of the new Earl Rivers’ efforts in driving the Duke of Clarence and the Earl of Warwick from the south coast into France, King Edward was eventually forced to flee. When he took ship for exile, Earl Rivers accompanied him, returning six months later to help the king retake the throne.

In reward for his commitment and aid, Anthony was made Governor of Calais and the Marches for seven years and created Captain-General of the king’s forces. In 1471, Anthony acted as ambassador to the Duke of Brittany, taking with him one thousand men to negotiate a truce. When King Edward’s oldest son was created Prince of Wales, Anthony was chosen to head up the young Prince’s household at Ludlow and made Chief Butler of England. In 1473, Louys de Bretaylles loaned Anthony a book to pass a journey. Earl Rivers translated “Les Dictes Moraux des Philosophes” whilst in the Prince of Wales’ household and had his “The Dictes and Saying of the Philosophers” printed by Caxton in 1477, beating Richard, Duke of Gloucester to patronise the new printing press in London with his own work.

In 1474, on the birth of the King’s second son, Richard, Duke of York, Anthony participated in a grand tournament which included his nephews Thomas and Richard Grey, his brother Sir Edward Woodville, James Tyrell and John Cheney. Later that year he returned to France in the king’s service with forty men-at-arms and two hundred archers.

In more peaceful times, Anthony was frequently at court and also devoted himself to the education of his nephew, the future king. This peace was shattered in April 1483 when King Edward IV passed away following a brief illness. Suddenly, it seemed that a race for London was on. Lord Hastings in the capital wrote to the dead king’s brother, Richard, that he should make all haste to London with a force of men to prevent the Woodvilles enacting their plans for domination against the last wishes of King Edward. Rivers readied the new young king to depart the comfort and security of Ludlow.

That Rivers was party to any Woodville plot is, as mentioned, uncertain, but we do know that he was in correspondence with Richard and arranged to meet him en route. Rivers then overshot the agreed meeting place and installed the young king at the Woodville manor of Stony Stratford. This served to heighten Richard’s edgy concern, but far from rushing ahead to exclude the Protector, Rivers doubled back to meet Richard and assure him that they only wished to leave room for his men to billet. In spite of the assurances offered, Rivers was seized the next morning and sent north as a prisoner of Richard, Duke of Gloucester where he was joined by his nephew Richard Grey and the Prince’s chamberlain Thomas Vaughan.

Once in London, Richard swiftly sought the consent of the Council to execute the three on charges of treason. The council declined on the basis that Richard had not, at the time, been installed as regent and so treason against him was not possible. This was a clear warning shot and Richard’s intentions toward the men were not hard to discern. Therefore, on 23rd June 1483, Anthony Woodville, Earl Rivers sat down at a table within the walls of his captor’s fortress at Sheriff Hutton to compose his last will and testament.

“In the name of our Lord, Amen. I, Antony Widevile, in hole mynd and fressh memory, in the Castell of Shiryfhoton the xxiij day of Juyn, and the vigill of Seint John Baptyst, the yere of our Lord Mi cccclxxxiij, make my testament and last will in the forme folowyng.”

Signature of Anthony Woodville, Earl Rivers
Signature of Anthony Woodville, Earl Rivers

The will reads more like a stream of consciousness rather than a carefully prepared document, which is perhaps not surprising in the claustrophobic circumstances. Anthony deals initially with any Woodville lands that he held:

“I will that all such land as was my lord my faders, remayne holy to his right heyres ; with my cupp of gold of columbyne, which was lefte me by bequest to that entent it shuld’ remayne to the right heires of my seid lord my faders”

Anthony’s next concern was the paying of his debts. To the medieval mind, temporal debts were a weight that held the soul in purgatory for an increased time, something all were keen to avoid. It is clear in reading the will that Anthony was racking his brains as he wrote, stripped of his “boke” of debts, which would be found “in my closett in London“. He recalls debts owed to the Bishop of Worcester, one Lomner, a London mercer, Ocles Mayce, “goldsmyth“, the Mayor of Lynne and Abrey, a draper from Norwich.

Rivers provided for the selling of “my fee simpill lond, that is to sey the maner of Tyrington hall in Middylton with the hundreth of Frebrigge, the maner of Wolv’ton with thadvowson in the counte of Norfolke, the maner of Rokey in Barway in the counte of Hertford“. These were to provide funds for the establishment of a hospital at Rochester for “xiii pour folkes” and for “other dedes of charite“. He also later requests that his armour and horse harness be sold “and with the money therof be bought shyrtes and smokkes to pouer folkes“, bequeathing “my gowne of tawney cloth of gold” to the Prior of Royston, adding “my trapper of blakk cloth of gold I geve to our Lady of Walsingham“.

Anthony provided for his wife, who he requested have “all such plate as was the same Henry Lowes, and other my plate to the value of asmoche thing as I hadd of his; also that she have all such plate as was geven hyr at our mariage, and the sparver of white sylke with iiii peyre of shetes, ii payre of fustians, a federbed, i chambring of gresylde“. He also willed that all of his servants should be paid in full for the Midsummer quarter, asking that each of them be provided with a “blak gowne“, and requested “that Tybold my barbor have v marks“.

Two further points of note leap from this document. Firstly, in light of recent controversy over the contested chosen place of burial of King Richard III, especially Chris Skidmore’s very recent release of a letter it is claimed points to his desire to be interred at York Minster, some of Anthony, Earl Rivers requests are significant. That Richard III established a chantry at York Minster is well known. The recent letter firmly insists that the priest there be properly paid to ensure their prayers for Richard’s soul. This is not, however, the same as proving he intended a mausoleum to be created there for him.

Earl Rivers wills his “grete gilt basons, and such a somme of money as myn executirs shall think goode” to Saint Mary’s in York “to pray for my soule“. He bequeathed a further sum of money at Bewdley, requesting that they “pray for the sowles of my seid lord my fadre, my lady my modre, my brother Sir John, me, and all Christen sowles“. He further left money to Wittington College in London “to pray for my soule“. In spite of these many requests for prayers, Anthony firmly states “My will is now to be buried before an Image of our blissid Lady Mary , with my lord Richard, in Pomfrete (Pontefract)“. It is clear that ensuring prayers were said for one’s soul was not a direct indication of an intention to be interred in a location. It may well point to places important to an individual, that hold a special place in their heart, of fond memories or some family tie, but there is not a direct correlation with a desire to buried in a place paid to offer prayers for a soul.

The second point of interest is Anthony’s selection of executors. He names the Bishop of Lincoln, then Chancellor of England and a close ally of Richard, Duke of Gloucester, the Bishop of Worcester, William Tunstall, Robert Poynz, Richard Hawte, William Catesby (a lawyer in the service of Richard), Andrew Dymmock (Anthony’s attorney) and Thomas Thorysby. There is perhaps little remarkable in these selection, apart from the inclusion of men close to the man responsible for Anthony’s arrest and who he must have feared would soon order his death. Anthony continues “Over this, I besech humbly, my Lord of Gloucestyr, in the worshipp of Cristes passhion and for the meryte and wele of his sowle, to comfort help and assist, as supervisor (for very trust) of this testament, that myn executours may with his pleasure fulfill this my last will“.

Anthony elected to appoint Richard supervisor of his executors. The two men were similar in many ways. Their reputations were almost mirrors, less Richard’s lack of interest in tournaments. Yet Richard was Anthony’s gaoler. This provision is frustratingly elusive and open to interpretation. Did Anthony simply accept that to see his wishes met he would have to go through Richard, who was so clearly now in control? Did he offer a little barb that Richard should take care for the “meryte and wele of his sowle“? Was it some sort of admission of his own guilt in seeking to plot against Richard? Or was it simply an act of friendship between two men, at odds now, but for so long on the same course?

The rambling nature of the writing is touching to read. Anthony is clearly a man fighting to recall all that could hinder his passage to Heaven and writing disparate provisions as they occur to him. He was obviously working hard through the fear and knowledge of what was surely to come. It seems clear that whatever the reason for appointing him supervisor of his executors, Anthony trusted Richard would do the right thing for him after his impending death. There is no sign of a man who feared the Protector meant the nephews they shared any harm.

This will was never proved. Perhaps Anthony Woodville was fooled by Richard, or perhaps he saw a truth lost to us now. That is for you to decide.

20 thoughts on “The Will of Anthony Woodville, Earl Rivers

  1. Anthony should have left word that he was going to Stoney Stratford when he left the agreed meeting place. Didn’t Richard have to send his men out to search for Anthony and when he was found, order him back to Stone Stratford. When he returned with some others, they spent a convivial evening but when Richard and his party were returning to their lodgings, they were attacked but managed to escape with their lives. A lot of historians say this was a fabrication by Richard but it rings true to me. Why did not Richard arrest him during that evening. Something must have happened between the convivial evening and when he was arrested.

    1. The biggest mysteries surround this time and the people in power. I am a Ricardian and believe things were deliberately misconstrued. There were a lot of people conspiring for different factions, and the end result seems to have been for the placement of Tudor on the throne, which we know happened. I hold Tudor and his supporters had a lot to do with those mysteries, alas, none of which can be known.

      1. Yes indeed, and the Contents page says it’s from the Prerogative Court of Canterbury like so many others, but there isn’t a second entry showing that it was proved. I’ve been looking at this book on Edward Woodville by Christopher Wilkins (not a Richard fan) http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=7vABAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA134&lpg=PA134&dq=will+of+anthony+woodville+-+prerogative+court+of+canterbury&source=bl&ots=RT4F62lQqm&sig=pL6uaK4JzAb2pk9yVF7Q1Nk0YkI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=xO6yU-q4NpKv7Aay74GgAw&ved=0CCIQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=will%20of%20anthony%20woodville%20-%20prerogative%20court%20of%20canterbury&f=false – he suggests that Andrew Dymmock, Rivers’ lawyer who was later taken up by Henry VII, must have taken the will to Canterbury ; Richard will have been disinclined to give Edward Woodville the Scales lands as he’d joined Henry.

  2. I have just been reading Part ll of ‘Secret History, The Truth about Richard lll and the Princes’ by John Dening but part ll R.E. Collins. He is convinced that Edward lV was murdered by the Woodvilles as Elizabeth’s power over him was waining and he was losing his power re the French. The chief perpetrators to be Thomas Grey, Marquis of Dorset , Elizabeth Woodville, Sir Edward Woodville and Anthony, Earl Rivers. Rivers’s actions prior to Edward’s death was quite suspicious – in March he wrote to his London agent Andrew Dymmock for copies of the letters patent granting him the governorship of the Prince and the right to raise troops (Mancini note 45 p75) He had been in London the week previously so why did he not obtain them then? He also instructed to Dymmock that he should hand over Rivers’ authority as Deputy Constable of the Tower to his nephew Thomas Grey, Marquis of Dorset. Now why was this? Was it to put power into the hands of someone who was in situ and not miles away in Ludlow? Also it was not Rivers gift to transfer it – so why the secrecy? This at a stroke had confirmed his his title to the Prince’s control, his right to raise an army and placed in the hands of his close ally the garrison and fortress of London together with it’s artillery and the Royal Treasure.
    Rivers’ action after Edward’s death was also strange – he did nothing. Edward died on April 9th and Rivers stayed at Ludlow until the 24th giving as his reason that he wished to celebrate the Rites of St George. Given that Edward was buried at the Chapel of St George in Windsor – the very heart of the Order – and that he was his brother in law, king and Head of the Order ….. why? Perhaps because the new king was a minor, and Edward had recently appointed Richard as Lord Protector which would come to an end when E5 was crowned, so it was necessary to set the date of the Coronation for as soon as possible and to keep the new king away from everyone until the last possible moment. Perhaps this is why he kept in Ludlow and perhaps why he overshot the meeting at Stoney Stratford, hoping Richard would arrive separately and not have a chance to meet up with E5.

  3. Why was the will not proved? What could we read into this fact about Richard’s character or his view of Anthony Woodville?

  4. Reblogged this on Giaconda's Blog and commented:
    Interesting piece and, as Matthew says, an illusive character. It is well nigh impossible at this distance to fathom the relationship between rivers and Gloucester and whether there was a plot to assassinate Gloucester en route to London. Anthony didn’t actually rush to the capital with the Prince of wales. It took several weeks to get everything ready to leave and they delayed in order to observe a saint’s day as well. Perhaps Anthony was not fully in step with his Woodville relations in London and perhaps he dreaded his meeting with Gloucester, we shall never know. It does feel sad to see such a cultured man end his days on the block. He had been loyal to the Yorkist cause through many trials and it seems a shoddy return to be imprisoned and executed in such circumstances and without the opportunity to clear his name of involvement in any plot. I wonder also about the hand of Buckingham and Hastings in this affair. Both were keen to play on Gloucester’s suspicions and fears during this period for their own ends and capable of inventing evidence if it lead to the downfall of their enemies. It is possible, of course, that Gloucester had secretly harboured hatred for Rivers and fabricated the whole plot just to be rid of him. It was important to seize control of the Prince and be seen to be the one leading him into London and he needed to counter the Woodville power block. Anthony would have had a huge hold over the young prince as the head of his household and there was evidence from letters written just before Edward IV’s death that his son was starting to flex his muscles a little and perhaps chafe at his guardian’s. I wonder why that would have been and whether Rivers had indeed risen a little too high as the contemporary pun went? A fascinating area to debate and pretty difficult to decide on from the available evidence.

  5. In The Secret history of King Richard III by John Dening contains a whole chapter on Lord Rivers and his odd behavior after the death of Edward IV. It’s worth reading. He seems to be anticipating the death of Edward before he even took.ill. Prime suspect behavior.

  6. Domenico Mancini seems to have provided the only detailed account of the events that led to the arrest of Rivers, and I’m afraid I don’t recognize Patricia’s version (I’d love to know the source!). This is something about which I’ve written a quite lengthy essay (see my website) and am giving talks on Zoom about it. My humble offering here is just to say that I recommend separating the arrests at Stony Stratford from the executions eight weeks later. Mancini is very confusing/confused about the grounds for the arrests, and his scenario imagining that Richard asked the King’s Council to inflict punishment on them is unbelievable on several levels, particularly comparing the Council’s limited powers with his own powers of condemnation as High Constable. If we set that aside and consider the events of the ensuing eight weeks, I believe it’s more likely they were held as hostages to bring the Woodville party to heel in London. Unfortunately it didn’t work.

  7. This has been a good read. Thanks for posting. I’m not far enough in my reading of the Plantagenets (a dynasty I’ve always been taken with) and later dynasties to fully understand this, but I’m curious now and will think about it moving forward.

  8. Annette Carson makes some good points which make complete sense. It is evident that Edward lV had lost the plot towards the end of his life and I can imagine that as a result the Woodville’s were getting increasingly anxious, especially when Edward named his brother as protector. Of course Rivers may have been a reluctant pawn in all of this or he may have been a principal player. I suspect the former but if he had knowledge of a plot it made him guilty. Shame because if Rivers was loyal to Gloucester and he had survived things could have turned out very different.

I would love to hear your thoughts and feedback.